Lucky Tiger Pty Ltd v Valuer General [2022] NSWLEC 1667
As the parties reached agreement at a conciliation conference on the proper land value and the decision was one the Court could have made, the Court must and does make orders reflecting the agreed value for the property as at 1 July 2021 under s 6A Valuation of Land Act 1916 and s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Lucky Tiger Pty Ltd ATF The Lucky Tiger Trust; Second Applicant: Eastwood 88 Pty Ltd; Respondent: Valuer General
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Valuation Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Land Valuation, Appeals, Conciliation Conferences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucky Tiger Pty Ltd ATF The Lucky Tiger Trust
First Applicant
Eastwood 88 Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Valuer General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Valuation Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the land value determined by the Valuer General for SP48982 as at 1 July 2021 was correct under s 6A of the Valuation of Land Act 1916
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties reached agreement at a conciliation conference on the proper land value and the decision was one the Court could have made, the Court must and does make orders reflecting the agreed value for the property as at 1 July 2021 under s 6A Valuation of Land Act 1916 and s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The land value of the property legally described as SP48982, known as 2 Rowe Street, Eastwood NSW 2122 for the Valuing Year 1 July 2021 is determined as $7,515,000.00 in accordance with s 6A of the Valuation of Land Act 1916.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment