Huynh, Van Tri v Pascoe, Scott Darren [2001] FCA 1187
The applicant had not provided a proof of debt in the bankrupt's estate at the relevant meetings and was therefore not a 'creditor who is entitled to vote' under s 64N(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth); accordingly, no quorum was present and there was no basis to order the removal of the trustee.
- Parties
- Applicant: Van Tri Huynh; Respondent: Scott Darren Pascoe
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Final Judgment on Application for Removal of Trustee
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Trustee, Quorum for Meetings of Creditors, Proof of Debt, Interpretation of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (cth)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Van Tri Huynh
Applicant
Scott Darren Pascoe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Final Judgment on Application for Removal of Trustee
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant was a 'creditor who is entitled to vote' within the meaning of s 64N(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
- 2 Whether a quorum was present at the meetings of creditors held on 17 November 2000 and 30 November 2000
- 3 Whether the applicant had given the respondent a proof of debt in the bankrupt's estate
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant had not provided a proof of debt in the bankrupt's estate at the relevant meetings and was therefore not a 'creditor who is entitled to vote' under s 64N(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth); accordingly, no quorum was present and there was no basis to order the removal of the trustee.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment