Hillie v Henson Properties Group [2012] NSWADT 194
The complaints lack substance as there is no evidence the applicant was treated less favourably than any comparator on the grounds of sex or marital status, nor that any alleged victimisation related to making discrimination complaints; leave to proceed is declined.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Proceed After Complaint Declined by Anti Discrimination Board / Decision on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Leave to proceed declined
- Legal Topics
- ['sex Discrimination' 'marital Status Discrimination' 'victimisation' 'residential Tenancy' 'provision of Goods and Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Proceed After Complaint Declined by Anti Discrimination Board / Decision on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether complaints of discrimination and victimisation lacked substance' 'Whether applicant was treated less favourably due to sex or marital status' 'Whether eviction and responses to complaints constituted unlawful discrimination' 'Whether alleged victimisation related to making discrimination complaints']
Ratio Decidendi
The complaints lack substance as there is no evidence the applicant was treated less favourably than any comparator on the grounds of sex or marital status, nor that any alleged victimisation related to making discrimination complaints; leave to proceed is declined.
Court Disposition
Leave to proceed declined
Orders
- ['Application for leave to proceed with anti-discrimination complaints declined']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment