Hutley v Cosco (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 335
Applications for indemnity costs based on offers of compromise and s 40(2)(b) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) were rejected because the offers were either not genuine compromises or not unreasonably refused; further, an application to vary the costs order to provide for indemnity costs or backdated interest was filed out of time or not supported by sufficient evidence, warranting refusal of the application.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vanessa Hutley; Respondent: Anthony Cosco
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Application refused and amended notice of motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Offers of Compromise, Interest on Costs, Defamation Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vanessa Hutley
Appellant
Anthony Cosco
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs of the trial should be assessed on an indemnity basis from certain dates or entirely
- 2 Whether interest on costs should be ordered from a date earlier than judgment under s 101(5) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
- 3 Whether the application to vary the prior order was out of time under UCPR r 36.16
Ratio Decidendi
Applications for indemnity costs based on offers of compromise and s 40(2)(b) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) were rejected because the offers were either not genuine compromises or not unreasonably refused; further, an application to vary the costs order to provide for indemnity costs or backdated interest was filed out of time or not supported by sufficient evidence, warranting refusal of the application.
Court Disposition
Application refused and amended notice of motion dismissed
Orders
- Refuse the application to vary order 2(b) made and entered on 23 February 2021.
- Dismiss the amended notice of motion dated 6 September 2021, with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment