Lynch v Sultana [2005] NSWDC 17

Lynch v Sultana [2005] NSWDC 17

As between Vanessa Jane Lynch and Victor Sultana, the court found that the 1985 W Series Kenworth truck and the Shovelhead Harley Davidson motorbike were relationship assets or assets in which Victor had a beneficial interest as at 26 March 2001, while the other post-separation vehicles, other motorbikes, and the claimed Prestons property interest were not proved to be relationship assets. Vanessa's dishonest signing of receipts did not preclude relief against Victor because Victor and Matthew knew the true source of funds. The W Series truck was valued at $90,000 and the Shovelhead at $35,000, and Vanessa was entitled to 50 per cent of their combined value. The court had no power to make...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Adjustment of Property Interests Arising Out of a De Facto Relationship Under the Property (relationships) Act 1984 / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
The plaintiff succeeded in obtaining a lump sum adjustment order against the first defendant.
Legal Topics
['assessment of Joint Assets at Time of Separation' 'transactions to Defeat Claims' 'clean Hands' 'orders Against Third Parties' 'amendment of Claim' 'limitation Period']
['property Relationships' 'de Facto Relationship Property' 'equity'] ['assessment of Joint Assets at Time of Separation' 'transactions to Defeat Claims' 'clean Hands' 'orders Against Third Parties' 'amendment of Claim' 'limitation Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Adjustment of Property Interests Arising Out of a De Facto Relationship Under the Property (relationships) Act 1984 / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Which assets were joint assets or assets in which Victor Sultana had a beneficial interest as at 26 March 2001.' 'Whether the 1985 W Series Kenworth truck and the Shovelhead Harley Davidson motorbike should be treated as assets of the relationship.' "Whether Victor Sultana had an interest in land at Prestons arising from his late father's estate." "Whether Vanessa Jane Lynch's conduct in signing receipts affected her entitlement to relief on clean hands or just and equitable grounds." 'Whether orders could be made against Matthew Sultana or Sultana Transport Pty Ltd other than under s 42 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984.' 'Whether amendment should be allowed to seek orders concerning sale or charge over the W Series truck and motorbikes.']

Ratio Decidendi

As between Vanessa Jane Lynch and Victor Sultana, the court found that the 1985 W Series Kenworth truck and the Shovelhead Harley Davidson motorbike were relationship assets or assets in which Victor had a beneficial interest as at 26 March 2001, while the other post-separation vehicles, other motorbikes, and the claimed Prestons property interest were not proved to be relationship assets. Vanessa's dishonest signing of receipts did not preclude relief against Victor because Victor and Matthew knew the true source of funds. The W Series truck was valued at $90,000 and the Shovelhead at $35,000, and Vanessa was entitled to 50 per cent of their combined value. The court had no power to make...

Court Disposition

The plaintiff succeeded in obtaining a lump sum adjustment order against the first defendant.

Orders

  • ['The first defendant pay to the plaintiff a lump sum of $62,500.']