Hildebrand v R [2021] NSWCCA 9
It was not permissible for the sentencing judge to take into account Commonwealth offences on NSW Form 1s attached to State principal offences. Since the federal regime provides exhaustively for the procedure to take federal offences into account in sentencing (s 16BA, Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)), and does not allow them to be taken into account under state Form 1 procedure, an error of law was made. As a result, the applicant had not been sentenced according to law in relation to those offences, requiring the sentences to be quashed and the matter remitted for resentencing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'commonwealth Offences' 'state Offences' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'inconsistency of Federal and State Law' 'form 1 Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a New South Wales ('Form 1') procedure can lawfully take into account Commonwealth offences when sentencing for State principal offences" 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to take into account the proper procedure under federal sentencing law, specifically s 16BA of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessment of special circumstances and objective seriousness']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not permissible for the sentencing judge to take into account Commonwealth offences on NSW Form 1s attached to State principal offences. Since the federal regime provides exhaustively for the procedure to take federal offences into account in sentencing (s 16BA, Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)), and does not allow them to be taken into account under state Form 1 procedure, an error of law was made. As a result, the applicant had not been sentenced according to law in relation to those offences, requiring the sentences to be quashed and the matter remitted for resentencing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Quash the sentences imposed by Judge Tupman in the District Court on 27 September 2019.' 'Remit the proceedings to the District Court for sentence.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment