Bunter, Vaughn Charles v John Shearer Limited [1984] FCA 23
The applicant failed to establish any breach of merchantable quality or fitness for purpose in the sale of the airseeder; the problems encountered were due principally to the applicant's installation and operation of a hydraulic drive system without a priority valve and inappropriate directions for its use, not to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Vaughn Charles Bunter; Applicant: Jean Bunter; Respondent: John Shearer Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Merchantable Quality, Fitness for Purpose, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Express Warranties, Trade Practices Act 1974
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vaughn Charles Bunter
Applicant
Jean Bunter
Applicant
John Shearer Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale and supply of an airseeder breached conditions of merchantable quality and fitness for purpose under Trade Practices Act 1974 section 71
- 2 Whether the respondent engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under sections 52 and 55 of the Trade Practices Act 1974
- 3 Whether there was a breach of express written warranties
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish any breach of merchantable quality or fitness for purpose in the sale of the airseeder; the problems encountered were due principally to the applicant's installation and operation of a hydraulic drive system without a priority valve and inappropriate directions for its use, not to any defect of the airseeder itself. There were no misleading or deceptive representations or breach of express warranties. Division 2A did not apply as the airseeder was not of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic, or household use.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The applicant's claim be dismissed.
- Money paid into court by the respondent be paid out to the respondent's solicitors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment