Storry v Business Licensing Authority (No 3) [2023] FCA 245

Storry v Business Licensing Authority (No 3) [2023] FCA 245

The Court made no order as to costs because the successful respondent did not seek costs and the applicant contended no costs should be ordered against her.

Parties
Applicant: Venetia Louise Storry; First Respondent: Business Licensing Authority; Second Respondent: Office of Fair Trading (Victoria)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Outcome
No order as to costs
Legal Topics
Costs
Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Venetia Louise Storry

Applicant

Business Licensing Authority

First Respondent

Office of Fair Trading (Victoria)

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an order for costs should be made where the respondent made no application for costs

Ratio Decidendi

The Court made no order as to costs because the successful respondent did not seek costs and the applicant contended no costs should be ordered against her.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs

Orders

  • There be no order as to costs