Ventana Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corp & Anor [1997] FCA 538

Ventana Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corp & Anor [1997] FCA 538

The Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) and Kingston Planning Scheme do not bind the Crown in right of the Commonwealth. The Federal Airports Corporation is entitled to Crown immunity, which extends to lessee activities at a Federal airport. Section 7(2)(d) of the Federal Airports Corporation Act requires only that the FAC endeavour to comply with State law regarding non-aviation land uses, but imposes no enforceable legal obligation to obtain State permits.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 June 1997
Procedural Posture
Originating Application / Determination of Reserved Questions Under O.29 R.2 of Federal Court Rules (preliminary Questions Before Trial)
Outcome
Reserved questions answered as follows: (1) No; (2) Yes; (3) Yes; (4)(a) Yes, (b) Yes; application adjourned for further directions.
Legal Topics
['crown Immunity' 'federal Statutory Corporations' 'application of State Planning Laws to Federal Land' 'leasehold Use at Federal Airports']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Originating Application / Determination of Reserved Questions Under O.29 R.2 of Federal Court Rules (preliminary Questions Before Trial)

  1. 1 ['Whether Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) and Kingston Planning Scheme bind the Crown in right of the Commonwealth' 'Whether Federal Airports Corporation has Crown immunity' 'Whether Crown immunity extends to lessee activities' 'Whether s.7(2)(d) of Federal Airports Corporation Act allows non-aviation uses by lessee without State planning permit']

Ratio Decidendi

The Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) and Kingston Planning Scheme do not bind the Crown in right of the Commonwealth. The Federal Airports Corporation is entitled to Crown immunity, which extends to lessee activities at a Federal airport. Section 7(2)(d) of the Federal Airports Corporation Act requires only that the FAC endeavour to comply with State law regarding non-aviation land uses, but imposes no enforceable legal obligation to obtain State permits.

Court Disposition

Reserved questions answered as follows: (1) No; (2) Yes; (3) Yes; (4)(a) Yes, (b) Yes; application adjourned for further directions.

Orders

  • ['The questions reserved pursuant to O.29 r.2 of the Federal Court Rules answered: (1) No; (2) Yes; (3) Yes; (4)(a) Yes; (4)(b) Yes.' 'Application adjourned before Ryan J for further directions on a date and at a time to be fixed.']