Blair v First Nations Bailai, Gurang, Gooreng Gooreng, Taribelang Bunda People Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC [2022] FCA 1520
The applicants established a serious question to be tried regarding the directors’ obligations to promptly consider and admit eligible membership applications under s 144-10(3A) CATSI Act. The balance of convenience favoured the grant of a limited interim injunction to prevent the first respondent from considering or passing the proposed special resolution to amend the Rule Book because, absent this relief, the applicants could be irreparably prejudiced by being excluded from voting on structural changes that could restrict their future membership and participation rights. The injunction was limited to the relevant SGM and resolution, not broader consultation meetings.
- Parties
- Applicant: Veronica Cheryl Blair; Applicant: Janelle Ruth Evans; Applicant: Fiona Richardson; Applicant: Estelle Fisher; Applicant: Felicity Fisher; Applicant: Lynette Skeen; Applicant: William Munns; Applicant: Beverley Leisha; Applicant: Roger Leisha; Applicant: Elaine Fisher; Applicant: Robert Gulf; Applicant: Christell Jarrett; Applicant: Wagwan Savage; Applicant: Anthony Jarrett; Applicant: William Charles Gulf; Applicant: Wallebi Kuvindabar; Applicant: Delphine Cecilia Joyce Williams; Applicant: Rachel Amelia Kemp; Applicant: Stewart Maurice Smith; Applicant: Nigel Smith; Applicant: Emma Smith; Applicant: Lydia Smith; Applicant: Ethan Cecil Keith Smith; Applicant: Stewart Smith; Applicant: Dorothy Else Kemp; Applicant: Allira Mamie Grant; Applicant: Miriam Grace Tilberoo; Applicant: Loretta Miller; Applicant: Jeffrey Accoom; Applicant: Lynette Murphy; Applicant: Karen Murphy; Applicant: Crystal Ross; Applicant: Ida Lammermooor; Applicant: Keenan Richardson; Applicant: Steven Grant Silvester; Applicant: Reginald Roe; Applicant: Ida Rose Lammermoor; Applicant: Stephen Joseph McDonald; Applicant: Mary-Ann Millicent Lammermooor; Applicant: Julianne Winnifred Ingra; Applicant: Phillip Keith Lammermooor; Applicant: Katherine Murphy; Applicant: Yasmine Murphy; Applicant: Neola Savage; Applicant: Kenneth Michael Thompson; First Respondent: First Nations Bailai, Gurang, Gooreng Gooreng, Taribelang Bunda People Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC ICN8650; Second Respondent: Kerry Blackman; Third Respondent: Shayne Blackman; Other: Registrar Grant; Fourth Respondent: Matthew Wayne Cooke; Fifth Respondent: Miss Lee-Ann Dudley; Sixth Respondent: Marcia Morris; Seventh Respondent: Kristin Sarra; Eighth Respondent: Christopher Thiesfield; Ninth Respondent: Norelle Watson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application – Injunction / Interim Interlocutory Injunction (before Trial of Main Proceeding)
- Outcome
- Interim interlocutory injunction granted, leave to amend originating process granted, costs to applicants.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Membership of Aboriginal Corporations, CATSI Act Compliance, Native Title Act Compliance, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Veronica Cheryl Blair
Applicant
Janelle Ruth Evans
Applicant
Fiona Richardson
Applicant
Estelle Fisher
Applicant
Felicity Fisher
Applicant
Lynette Skeen
Applicant
William Munns
Applicant
Beverley Leisha
Applicant
Roger Leisha
Applicant
Elaine Fisher
Applicant
Robert Gulf
Applicant
Christell Jarrett
Applicant
Wagwan Savage
Applicant
Anthony Jarrett
Applicant
William Charles Gulf
Applicant
Wallebi Kuvindabar
Applicant
Delphine Cecilia Joyce Williams
Applicant
Rachel Amelia Kemp
Applicant
Stewart Maurice Smith
Applicant
Nigel Smith
Applicant
Emma Smith
Applicant
Lydia Smith
Applicant
Ethan Cecil Keith Smith
Applicant
Stewart Smith
Applicant
Dorothy Else Kemp
Applicant
Allira Mamie Grant
Applicant
Miriam Grace Tilberoo
Applicant
Loretta Miller
Applicant
Jeffrey Accoom
Applicant
Lynette Murphy
Applicant
Karen Murphy
Applicant
Crystal Ross
Applicant
Ida Lammermooor
Applicant
Keenan Richardson
Applicant
Steven Grant Silvester
Applicant
Reginald Roe
Applicant
Ida Rose Lammermoor
Applicant
Stephen Joseph McDonald
Applicant
Mary-Ann Millicent Lammermooor
Applicant
Julianne Winnifred Ingra
Applicant
Phillip Keith Lammermooor
Applicant
Katherine Murphy
Applicant
Yasmine Murphy
Applicant
Neola Savage
Applicant
Kenneth Michael Thompson
Applicant
First Nations Bailai, Gurang, Gooreng Gooreng, Taribelang Bunda People Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC ICN8650
First Respondent
Kerry Blackman
Second Respondent
Shayne Blackman
Third Respondent
Registrar Grant
Other
Matthew Wayne Cooke
Fourth Respondent
Miss Lee-Ann Dudley
Fifth Respondent
Marcia Morris
Sixth Respondent
Kristin Sarra
Seventh Respondent
Christopher Thiesfield
Eighth Respondent
Norelle Watson
Ninth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application – Injunction / Interim Interlocutory Injunction (before Trial of Main Proceeding)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an urgent interlocutory injunction should restrain the first respondent from considering resolutions to amend its Rule Book affecting members' rights before applications for membership are determined
- 2 Whether the first respondent's proposed amendments to its Rule Book are necessary to comply with the amended Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) and Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
- 3 Whether the directors of the first respondent have complied with their statutory duties in considering membership applications
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants established a serious question to be tried regarding the directors’ obligations to promptly consider and admit eligible membership applications under s 144-10(3A) CATSI Act. The balance of convenience favoured the grant of a limited interim injunction to prevent the first respondent from considering or passing the proposed special resolution to amend the Rule Book because, absent this relief, the applicants could be irreparably prejudiced by being excluded from voting on structural changes that could restrict their future membership and participation rights. The injunction was limited to the relevant SGM and resolution, not broader consultation meetings.
Court Disposition
Interim interlocutory injunction granted, leave to amend originating process granted, costs to applicants.
Orders
- Leave granted to the applicants to file an amended originating application seeking final relief in the form of an injunction restraining the first respondent from considering or passing the resolution in the notice for the 18 December 2022 Special General Meeting until after judgment or further order.
- An interim injunction restraining the first respondent from considering or passing the resolution in the Special General Meeting notice until after judgment or further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment