Veronica Susan Dockrell v Mayfield Education Centre Inc [1995] IRCA 677
The redundancy and termination were effected without warning or consideration of alternatives, notwithstanding express representations of secure employment. The process was harsh under s170DE(2), justifying compensation under s170EE(3).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Reasons for Decision on Alleged Unlawful Termination—remedy and Orders
- Outcome
- Application succeeded in part; compensation ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Termination' 'redundancy' 'harsh, Unjust or Unreasonable Dismissal' 'compensation' 'employment Security Representations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Reasons for Decision on Alleged Unlawful Termination—remedy and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's termination by redundancy was harsh, unjust or unreasonable under s170DE(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1988." "Whether adequate consideration was given to alternatives to redundancy and applicant's circumstances." 'Appropriateness of compensation pursuant to s170EE(3) of the Act.']
Ratio Decidendi
The redundancy and termination were effected without warning or consideration of alternatives, notwithstanding express representations of secure employment. The process was harsh under s170DE(2), justifying compensation under s170EE(3).
Court Disposition
Application succeeded in part; compensation ordered.
Orders
- ['Respondent to pay to the applicant compensation in the amount of $4,548.00.' 'Payment to be made within twenty one days from the date of the order.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment