In the matter of Veysel's International Import & Export Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 813
There was a genuine dispute as to the existence and amount of the debt and the validity of the assignment, which justified setting aside the statutory demand; the defendant acted unreasonably in persisting with the statutory demand in these circumstances, warranting an indemnity costs order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Statutory demand set aside.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'statutory Demands' 'application to Set Aside Statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'assignment of Debt' 'costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offer']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there is a genuine dispute about the existence or amount of the debt to which the statutory demand relates' 'Whether the assignment of the debt was valid' 'Whether indemnity costs should be awarded']
Ratio Decidendi
There was a genuine dispute as to the existence and amount of the debt and the validity of the assignment, which justified setting aside the statutory demand; the defendant acted unreasonably in persisting with the statutory demand in these circumstances, warranting an indemnity costs order.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand set aside.
Orders
- ['The statutory demand dated 13 March 2013 served by the defendant on the plaintiff be set aside.' "The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment