Inspector John Patton v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd & Anor [2005] NSWIRComm 234
The defendants were properly notified of both the costs claim and the hearing. The prosecutor’s costs are reasonable in light of preparation and the conduct of the prosecutions. Joint and several liability for costs is justified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution / Costs Determination After Pleas of Guilty and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Costs order made in favor of the prosecutor, jointly and severally against both defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Quantification' 'reasonable Costs in Criminal Prosecutions' 'notification of Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Costs Determination After Pleas of Guilty and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendants were properly notified of the costs claim and hearing date' 'Whether the costs sought by the prosecutor are reasonable given the circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants were properly notified of both the costs claim and the hearing. The prosecutor’s costs are reasonable in light of preparation and the conduct of the prosecutions. Joint and several liability for costs is justified.
Court Disposition
Costs order made in favor of the prosecutor, jointly and severally against both defendants.
Orders
- ['In IRC3078 of 2002, the defendant is jointly and severally liable with the defendant in IRC3079 of 2002 to the prosecutor for costs in the sum of $15,579.40.' 'In IRC3079 of 2002, the defendant is jointly and severally liable with the defendant in IRC3078 of 2002 to the prosecutor for costs in the sum of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment