Apostoltos v Ilona Sturla / T/as Febtil P/L [1996] IRCA 223

Apostoltos v Ilona Sturla / T/as Febtil P/L [1996] IRCA 223

On the balance of probabilities, the applicant's employment was terminated by the respondent, not by resignation, making the respondent liable for compensation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 1996
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Unlawful Termination / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the applicant
Legal Topics
['unlawful Termination' 'resignation' 'compensation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Industrial Law Unlawful Termination / Judgment

  1. 1 ["Whether the applicant's employment was terminated by the respondent or if she resigned" 'Entitlement to compensation for unlawful termination']

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, the applicant's employment was terminated by the respondent, not by resignation, making the respondent liable for compensation.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the applicant

Orders

  • ['The respondent pay the sum of $6000 to the applicant.']