Cocksedge v. Centenary Hill Pre-School [2005] NSWIRComm 1076
The applicant did not make out a case that the respondent's conduct amounted to an unreasonable failure to settle within S.181(2)(c). The threshold for costs in Part 6 proceedings is high, and a party is entitled to have the dispute determined by arbitration rather than being penalised for not settling.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs Under S.181 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 Following Part 6 Unfair Dismissal Proceedings / Supplementary Decision
- Outcome
- Costs application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Dismissal' 'unreasonable Failure to Settle' 'conciliation' 'arbitration' 'costs Under Part 6']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs Under S.181 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 Following Part 6 Unfair Dismissal Proceedings / Supplementary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether costs should be awarded against the respondent under S.181(2)(c) on the basis of an unreasonable failure to agree to a settlement of the applicant's Part 6 unfair dismissal claim."]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not make out a case that the respondent's conduct amounted to an unreasonable failure to settle within S.181(2)(c). The threshold for costs in Part 6 proceedings is high, and a party is entitled to have the dispute determined by arbitration rather than being penalised for not settling.
Court Disposition
Costs application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for costs is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment