Lees v Blacktown Arts and Crafts Group [2021] NSWCATAD 261
The applicants had not applied for membership of the respondent group in accordance with its constitution (which required nomination by a member); therefore, they did not suffer a detriment related to their prior anti-discrimination proceedings, and had not established any grounds justifying a grant of leave to proceed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Proceed With Complaints Under Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Determination of Leave to Proceed
- Outcome
- Leave for the complaints to proceed is refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['victimisation' 'application for Leave' 'detriment' 'lack of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Proceed With Complaints Under Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Determination of Leave to Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for the complaints to proceed under s 96 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977' 'Whether the applicants suffered detriment by reason of prior anti-discrimination proceedings (victimisation)']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants had not applied for membership of the respondent group in accordance with its constitution (which required nomination by a member); therefore, they did not suffer a detriment related to their prior anti-discrimination proceedings, and had not established any grounds justifying a grant of leave to proceed.
Court Disposition
Leave for the complaints to proceed is refused.
Orders
- ['Leave for the complaints to proceed is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment