Jenkins v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [2000] NSWDC 7
The intruders' unlawful entry into the applicant's home, in circumstances causing fear and apprehension of harm to herself or her child, constituted violent conduct against her occurring in the commission of an offence and therefore an act of violence under s 5 of the Victims Compensation Act 1996; physical contact or an express threat was not required. The Chairperson misdirected himself by treating the absence of such conduct as fatal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Determination of the Chairperson of the Victims Compensation Tribunal / District Court Determination of Notice of Motion and Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal upheld; matter remitted to the Tribunal for further determination; costs ordered in favour of the appellant.
- Legal Topics
- ['act of Violence' 'violent Conduct' 'apprehended Violence' 'home Invasion' 'victims Compensation Act 1996 S 5']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Determination of the Chairperson of the Victims Compensation Tribunal / District Court Determination of Notice of Motion and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a home invasion in which intruders entered the applicant's dwelling and caused fear amounted to an act of violence under s 5(1)(b) of the Victims Compensation Act 1996." 'Whether violent conduct under s 5 requires physical contact, physical injury, oral threats, gestures, weapons, or other direct assaultive conduct.' 'Whether the Chairperson misdirected himself in interpreting what constitutes an act of violence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The intruders' unlawful entry into the applicant's home, in circumstances causing fear and apprehension of harm to herself or her child, constituted violent conduct against her occurring in the commission of an offence and therefore an act of violence under s 5 of the Victims Compensation Act 1996; physical contact or an express threat was not required. The Chairperson misdirected himself by treating the absence of such conduct as fatal.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal upheld; matter remitted to the Tribunal for further determination; costs ordered in favour of the appellant.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal upheld.' 'The matter is remitted to the Tribunal for further determination to be dealt with in accordance with the decision of the District Court on the question of law concerned.' "The Tribunal is to pay the appellant's costs of this application." 'Identical orders made in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment