Symons v VCFC [2002] NSWDC 12
There was no error of law in the Tribunal's determination refusing to receive the Donnelly report because it had not been shown that the evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before the assessor's determination; ample opportunity had been given to obtain the report, and the Court was not satisfied that it would make the difference suggested.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal to the District Court From a Determination of the Victims Compensation Fund Corporation/victims Compensation Tribunal / Hearing of Appeal on a Question of Law
- Outcome
- Appeal rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['exceptional Circumstances' 'further Evidence or Material' 'questions of Law' 'reasonable Diligence' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal to the District Court From a Determination of the Victims Compensation Fund Corporation/victims Compensation Tribunal / Hearing of Appeal on a Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in law by rejecting the report of psychologist James Donnelly.' 'Whether special grounds or exceptional circumstances existed for the reception of further evidence or material.' "Whether the Donnelly report could have been obtained with reasonable diligence before the assessor's determination."]
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law in the Tribunal's determination refusing to receive the Donnelly report because it had not been shown that the evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before the assessor's determination; ample opportunity had been given to obtain the report, and the Court was not satisfied that it would make the difference suggested.
Court Disposition
Appeal rejected.
Orders
- ['The appeal is rejected.' 'No order as to the costs of this appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment