Jeffery & ors -v- Roberts (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 115

Jeffery & ors -v- Roberts (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 115

The Tribunal found that the documents sought were relevant to the substantive issue and likely to contain evidence on whether Mr Roberts provided misleading information in his Candidate Information Sheet. The applicant's use of the summons was not an abuse of process. Mr Roberts lacked standing to argue oppressiveness or procedural error as the summons was not addressed to him. The Tribunal had power to allow amendment of the summons, and any prejudice from access to private information could be managed by Tribunal controls and directions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Summons Application to Set Aside / Preliminary Matter
Outcome
Application to set aside the summons dismissed; access to the documents granted to both parties.
Legal Topics
['summons to Produce Documents' 'abuse of Process' 'relevance of Documents' 'oppression' 'power to Amend Summons']
['administrative Law'] ['summons to Produce Documents' 'abuse of Process' 'relevance of Documents' 'oppression' 'power to Amend Summons']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Summons Application to Set Aside / Preliminary Matter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the amended summons to produce documents should be set aside on grounds of irrelevance, oppressiveness, improper amendment procedure or abuse of process']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the documents sought were relevant to the substantive issue and likely to contain evidence on whether Mr Roberts provided misleading information in his Candidate Information Sheet. The applicant's use of the summons was not an abuse of process. Mr Roberts lacked standing to argue oppressiveness or procedural error as the summons was not addressed to him. The Tribunal had power to allow amendment of the summons, and any prejudice from access to private information could be managed by Tribunal controls and directions.

Court Disposition

Application to set aside the summons dismissed; access to the documents granted to both parties.

Orders

  • ['The application to set the summons aside is dismissed.' 'Access to the documents provided under the amended summons is granted to both parties.']