Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1727
The Court was satisfied, on the evidence, documents, site observations, oral submissions and the agreed jurisdictional statement, that the amended Modification Application met the relevant jurisdictional requirements, involved minimal environmental impact, was substantially the same development as the original consent, had been appropriately notified with no submissions, and produced an agreed decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The Court therefore disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement and upheld the appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal Concerning a Modification Application / Orders Made Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Modification Application MOD2022/0373 approved as amended, subject to modified and consolidated conditions of consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Appeal' 'modification Application' 'boarding House' 'conditions of Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Reached']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal Concerning a Modification Application / Orders Made Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court had power to determine the modification application under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether the Modification Application, as amended, satisfied the jurisdictional prerequisites for modification of the development consent.' "Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions so that the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied, on the evidence, documents, site observations, oral submissions and the agreed jurisdictional statement, that the amended Modification Application met the relevant jurisdictional requirements, involved minimal environmental impact, was substantially the same development as the original consent, had been appropriately notified with no submissions, and produced an agreed decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The Court therefore disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement and upheld the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Modification Application MOD2022/0373 approved as amended, subject to modified and consolidated conditions of consent.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Modification Application MOD2022/0373, as amended, to modify development DA2013/0324 for demolition works and construction of a Boarding House at 257 Harbord Road DEE WHY NSW, being Lot 1770 DP 752038, is approved, subject to the modified conditions set out in Annexure A.' 'As a consequence...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment