Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2016] NSWLEC 1312
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and make orders giving effect to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application No. Da2014/1180 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'construction of a Boarding House' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'development Consent' 'costs Thrown Away']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application No. Da2014/1180 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether orders should be made to give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and make orders giving effect to it.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the plans set out in operational condition 1 in Annexure "A".' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to s.97B as may be agreed or assessed." 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment