Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2004] NSWLEC 162
The proposal is likely to have a significant effect on threatened species—specifically, a local significant population of tetratheca glandulosa and its habitat—and the eight-part test was not properly satisfied in relation to the Southern Brown Bandicoot. Therefore, a Species Impact Statement is required under s 78A(8)(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, and the absence of such a statement causes the appeal to fail. The proposal is also inconsistent with the desired future character for Locality B2 Oxford Falls Valley, and other planning controls. As a result, the appeal is dismissed and development consent is refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development consent refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'threatened Species' 'species Impact Statement' 'bushfire Protection' 'visual Impact' 'land Use Planning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the site is suitable for the proposed development given housing density standards, access, environmental impacts including bushfire measures and flora and fauna impacts' 'Whether consent should be granted in the absence of sufficient information as to access, environmental and engineering matters' 'Whether a Species Impact Statement is required under s 78A(8)(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the proposal will have an unacceptable impact on threatened species (tetratheca glandulosa, Southern Brown Bandicoot, Red Crowned Toadlet) and their habitats' 'Whether the proposal is inconsistent with the desired future character for Locality B2 Oxford Falls Valley under Warringah LEP 2000' 'Whether the proposal is inconsistent with principles of development control regarding flora, bulk, sloping land, watercourses, traffic access, stormwater, and construction impact']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal is likely to have a significant effect on threatened species—specifically, a local significant population of tetratheca glandulosa and its habitat—and the eight-part test was not properly satisfied in relation to the Southern Brown Bandicoot. Therefore, a Species Impact Statement is required under s 78A(8)(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, and the absence of such a statement causes the appeal to fail. The proposal is also inconsistent with the desired future character for Locality B2 Oxford Falls Valley, and other planning controls. As a result, the appeal is dismissed and development consent is refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development consent refused.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The exhibits are returned to the parties except specified exhibits.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment