Vimresh Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2019] NSWLEC 1613

Vimresh Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2019] NSWLEC 1613

The amended plans and supporting documents satisfied the relevant requirements of s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, there were no jurisdictional impediments to the parties' agreement, and the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision by upholding the appeal and granting consent subject to conditions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application DA 2017/1364 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Parties Reached Agreement and Orders Made
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Legal Topics
['seniors Housing' 'view Loss' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'development Consent' 'costs Thrown Away']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application DA 2017/1364 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Parties Reached Agreement and Orders Made

  1. 1 ["Whether the Court could dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether Development Application DA 2017/1364, as amended, satisfied the requirements of s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' "Whether the amended plans addressed relevant planning controls and objectors' concerns, including floor space ratio, local character, view loss, overshadowing, privacy and setbacks."]

Ratio Decidendi

The amended plans and supporting documents satisfied the relevant requirements of s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, there were no jurisdictional impediments to the parties' agreement, and the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision by upholding the appeal and granting consent subject to conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.

Orders

  • ['The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely upon the following plans and drawings as referred to in the conditions of consent at Annexure "B" and listed and attached at Annexure "A".' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the...