Director-General, Department of Environment Climate Change and Water v Vin Heffernan Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 200
A monetary penalty of $30,150 is appropriate, having regard to the low to moderate objective gravity of the offence, the defendant's negligent state of mind, genuine remorse, early guilty plea, good character, assistance in related prosecutions, and the need for general deterrence, with a 33% discount applied.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and monetary penalty
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Clearing of Native Vegetation' 'sentencing for Environmental Offences']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for unlawful clearing of native vegetation contrary to s 12 Native Vegetation Act 2003?' 'What subjective and objective factors mitigate or aggravate the penalty?' 'Should discount be given for guilty plea and assistance in related prosecutions?']
Ratio Decidendi
A monetary penalty of $30,150 is appropriate, having regard to the low to moderate objective gravity of the offence, the defendant's negligent state of mind, genuine remorse, early guilty plea, good character, assistance in related prosecutions, and the need for general deterrence, with a 33% discount applied.
Court Disposition
conviction and monetary penalty
Orders
- ['Defendant is convicted of the offence as charged.' 'Defendant is fined $30,150.' "Defendant is to pay prosecutor's costs in the sum of $30,000 within 28 days." 'Exhibits are to be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment