Couch v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCATAP 253

Couch v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCATAP 253

The Tribunal had the power under s 105 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 to grant an injunction restraining a party (such as the LHC) from proceeding with possession proceedings, but no such order was sought; as the only order sought was against the Tribunal itself, and as s 105 does not empower the Tribunal to make orders against itself restraining other proceedings, the Tribunal was correct to dismiss the application.

Parties
Appellant: Vincent Crouch; First Respondent: NSW Land and Housing Corporation; Second Respondent: Department of Family and Community Services
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits Determination
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Tribunal Powers, Residential Tenancy Proceedings, Disability Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Crouch

Appellant

NSW Land and Housing Corporation

First Respondent

Department of Family and Community Services

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits Determination

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal had power under s 105 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) to grant an interim order staying proceedings in the Consumer and Commercial Division
  2. 2 Whether an injunction could be issued against the Tribunal itself rather than a party
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal properly exercised its jurisdiction in refusing the order

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal had the power under s 105 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 to grant an injunction restraining a party (such as the LHC) from proceeding with possession proceedings, but no such order was sought; as the only order sought was against the Tribunal itself, and as s 105 does not empower the Tribunal to make orders against itself restraining other proceedings, the Tribunal was correct to dismiss the application.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted
  • The appeal is dismissed