Stanizzo v Badarne [2015] NSWSC 26
A decision regarding the transfer of the District Court proceedings should not be made summarily at this stage; it should wait until after the application for leave to amend has been resolved so that the extent of factual overlap and issues is clearer.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Vincent Francis Stanizzo; First Defendant: Muhammad Badarne; Second Defendant: Good Legal Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Abdul Karim Charmand; Fourth Defendant: Nasser Aouad
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Transfer of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Declined to deal with the application to dismiss the transfer application summarily; left the matter to be determined at a later date.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Interlocutory Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vincent Francis Stanizzo
Plaintiff
Muhammad Badarne
First Defendant
Good Legal Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Abdul Karim Charmand
Third Defendant
Nasser Aouad
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Transfer of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to deal summarily with an application to transfer District Court proceedings to the Supreme Court
- 2 Whether the application can be properly decided before the factual issues are clarified
Ratio Decidendi
A decision regarding the transfer of the District Court proceedings should not be made summarily at this stage; it should wait until after the application for leave to amend has been resolved so that the extent of factual overlap and issues is clearer.
Court Disposition
Declined to deal with the application to dismiss the transfer application summarily; left the matter to be determined at a later date.
Orders
- Application to summarily dismiss prayer one of the plaintiff's notice of motion filed on 30 July 2014 is declined to be dealt with today.
- Matter to be dealt with on or after 13 March 2015, subject to further order of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment