Stanizzo v Badarne [2015] NSWSC 26

Stanizzo v Badarne [2015] NSWSC 26

A decision regarding the transfer of the District Court proceedings should not be made summarily at this stage; it should wait until after the application for leave to amend has been resolved so that the extent of factual overlap and issues is clearer.

Parties
Plaintiff: Vincent Francis Stanizzo; First Defendant: Muhammad Badarne; Second Defendant: Good Legal Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Abdul Karim Charmand; Fourth Defendant: Nasser Aouad
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Transfer of Proceedings
Outcome
Declined to deal with the application to dismiss the transfer application summarily; left the matter to be determined at a later date.
Legal Topics
Transfer of Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Interlocutory Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Francis Stanizzo

Plaintiff

Muhammad Badarne

First Defendant

Good Legal Pty Ltd

Second Defendant

Abdul Karim Charmand

Third Defendant

Nasser Aouad

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Transfer of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether to deal summarily with an application to transfer District Court proceedings to the Supreme Court
  2. 2 Whether the application can be properly decided before the factual issues are clarified

Ratio Decidendi

A decision regarding the transfer of the District Court proceedings should not be made summarily at this stage; it should wait until after the application for leave to amend has been resolved so that the extent of factual overlap and issues is clearer.

Court Disposition

Declined to deal with the application to dismiss the transfer application summarily; left the matter to be determined at a later date.

Orders

  • Application to summarily dismiss prayer one of the plaintiff's notice of motion filed on 30 July 2014 is declined to be dealt with today.
  • Matter to be dealt with on or after 13 March 2015, subject to further order of the court.