Regina v Virgona [1999] NSWCCA 136
Kirkham DCJ was entitled to find no special circumstances justifying an additional term longer than one-third of the minimum period. The sentence reflected the seriousness and criminality of the offences, and no error was demonstrated in the sentencing regime imposed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'indecent Assault' 'homosexual Intercourse With a Male' 'gross Indecency' 'sexual Assault Paedophilia' 'special Circumstances for Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether the sentence imposed was excessive for the offences' 'whether adequate weight was given to evidence of rehabilitation' 'whether the judge erred in failing to find special circumstances justifying departure from the statutory ratio between minimum and additional terms']
Ratio Decidendi
Kirkham DCJ was entitled to find no special circumstances justifying an additional term longer than one-third of the minimum period. The sentence reflected the seriousness and criminality of the offences, and no error was demonstrated in the sentencing regime imposed.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment