Vincent Wong v Woollahra Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1422
The agreement reached between the parties was acceptable and one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. Consequently, the Court is required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached, without a merit assessment of the underlying dispute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Agreed Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application modification approved by consent
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'section 34 Conciliation Agreements' 'modification Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Agreed Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conciliation agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was an acceptable basis for final orders' 'Whether the Court could have made the agreed decision in the proper exercise of its functions']
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement reached between the parties was acceptable and one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. Consequently, the Court is required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached, without a merit assessment of the underlying dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application modification approved by consent
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to rely on the amended plans referred to in condition A6 of the annexed conditions.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Section 96 Modification Application DA 344/2013/2 for the modification of the existing façade (street elevation) internal modifications including a new store room and changes to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment