Tran v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 533

Tran v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 533

Application for extension of time to review Tribunal's affirmation of visa cancellation must be dismissed because delay was excessive and inadequately explained, and there is no arguable case that the Tribunal erred in law or in the exercise of discretion.

Parties
Applicant: Vinh Luan Tran; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Migration / Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review; Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Visa Cancellation, Character Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vinh Luan Tran

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Migration / Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review; Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable grounds for 18 month delay in filing application for review
  2. 2 Whether Tribunal made an error of law
  3. 3 Whether the findings of the Tribunal were open to it on the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Application for extension of time to review Tribunal's affirmation of visa cancellation must be dismissed because delay was excessive and inadequately explained, and there is no arguable case that the Tribunal erred in law or in the exercise of discretion.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application be dismissed.
  • The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.