Violet Jamil v Anthony Mansour [2001] NSWSC 312

Violet Jamil v Anthony Mansour [2001] NSWSC 312

On the balance of probabilities, the evidence does not establish that the defendant holds a licence for value entitling him to occupy the premises; judgment for possession is granted to the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff for possession of the whole of the land and dwelling known as 319 Georges River Road, Croydon Park.
Legal Topics
['possession of Land' 'residential Tenancies' 'licence to Occupy']
['property Law'] ['possession of Land' 'residential Tenancies' 'licence to Occupy']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant holds a licence for value to occupy the subject premises' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the premises']

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, the evidence does not establish that the defendant holds a licence for value entitling him to occupy the premises; judgment for possession is granted to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff for possession of the whole of the land and dwelling known as 319 Georges River Road, Croydon Park.

Orders

  • ['Leave to the plaintiff to issue forthwith writ of possession, to lie in the Registry for twenty-eight days then may be enforced without further order.' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs including reserved costs of interlocutory applications." 'Exhibits to remain in Court for twenty-eight days; to be handed...