Viskauskas v Niland [1983] HCA 15
Section 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), and related provisions to the extent that they relate to s. 19 and complaints for a breach thereof, are inconsistent with the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and are therefore invalid by s. 109 of the Constitution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Relief Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs succeed; declaration and costs ordered in their favour.
- Legal Topics
- ['racial Discrimination' 'inconsistency Between Commonwealth and State Laws' 's. 109 of the Constitution' 'declaratory Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Relief Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) regarding racial discrimination are inconsistent with the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and thus invalid by virtue of s. 109 of the Constitution.']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), and related provisions to the extent that they relate to s. 19 and complaints for a breach thereof, are inconsistent with the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and are therefore invalid by s. 109 of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs succeed; declaration and costs ordered in their favour.
Orders
- ['Declare that the defendant has and had no power pursuant to the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 NSW, as amended, to investigate, to conduct conciliation proceedings in respect of, or to refer to the Equal Opportunity Tribunal a complaint arising out of the conduct by the plaintiffs, or any of them, with respect to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment