Kulik v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2009] FCA 716
The applicant failed to identify, with precision, the Centrelink decisions subject to his challenge and therefore did not disclose a justiciable controversy or cause of action capable of review by the Court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Vitaly Kulik; First Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal; Second Respondent: Centrelink
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Appeal / Directions/determination on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Application stands dismissed in default of compliance with orders or otherwise stands over for directions if complied with.
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Jurisdiction, Review of Government Decisions, Freedom of Information, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vitaly Kulik
Applicant
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
First Respondent
Centrelink
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Appeal / Directions/determination on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to review certain Centrelink decisions
- 2 Whether the applicant properly identified the decisions subject to review
- 3 Whether the application disclosed a justiciable controversy
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to identify, with precision, the Centrelink decisions subject to his challenge and therefore did not disclose a justiciable controversy or cause of action capable of review by the Court.
Court Disposition
Application stands dismissed in default of compliance with orders or otherwise stands over for directions if complied with.
Orders
- Applicant to file and serve affidavit annexing Centrelink decisions subject to review by 13 July 2009.
- Applicant to file and serve affidavit of service on solicitor for Second Respondent by 15 July 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment