Kulik v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2009] FCA 1324

Kulik v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2009] FCA 1324

The appeal was dismissed as no appellable error was identified in the lower court's judgment, the appellant's grounds did not disclose error, and no reasonable prospects for success were found.

Parties
Appellant: Vitaly Kulik; First Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal; Second Respondent: Centrelink
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Summary Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Federal Court Appeals, FOI Requests
Administrative Law Summary Dismissal Jurisdiction of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Federal Court Appeals FOI Requests

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vitaly Kulik

Appellant

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

First Respondent

Centrelink

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal has reasonable prospects of success
  2. 2 Whether error exists in refusal to remit matter to the Tribunal
  3. 3 Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to review the appellant's claim

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as no appellable error was identified in the lower court's judgment, the appellant's grounds did not disclose error, and no reasonable prospects for success were found.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed with costs