Evangelinidis, in the matter of Tsekouras v Tsekouras [2000] FCA 859
The adjournment was refused because there was no material showing a realistic prospect that Mr Tsekouras would obtain legal assistance within the requested period, the Court was not persuaded that his desire for legal assistance was genuine, there had been adequate time to issue any subpoena earlier, and the proposed subpoena was not shown to be likely to further his position.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition / Respondent's Application for an Adjournment
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused.
- Legal Topics
- ["creditor's Petition" 'adjournment' 'legal Representation' 'subpoena for Production of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition / Respondent's Application for an Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's request for a further four-week adjournment to obtain legal assistance should be granted." "Whether the respondent's wish to issue a subpoena for production of documents justified an adjournment."]
Ratio Decidendi
The adjournment was refused because there was no material showing a realistic prospect that Mr Tsekouras would obtain legal assistance within the requested period, the Court was not persuaded that his desire for legal assistance was genuine, there had been adequate time to issue any subpoena earlier, and the proposed subpoena was not shown to be likely to further his position.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused.
Orders
- ['The application for an adjournment of the proceedings be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment