Evangelinidis, in the matter of Tsekouras v Tsekouras [2000] FCA 860

Evangelinidis, in the matter of Tsekouras v Tsekouras [2000] FCA 860

There was no legitimate forensic purpose for an adjournment as there was evidence already before the court regarding payment and notice for applicant's attendance was not timely or sufficient.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Petition / Application for Adjournment
Outcome
application for adjournment refused
Legal Topics
['adjournment of Proceedings']
['civil Procedure'] ['adjournment of Proceedings']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Petition / Application for Adjournment

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be adjourned to allow the respondent to obtain legal assistance, issue subpoenas, and call the applicant to give evidence.']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no legitimate forensic purpose for an adjournment as there was evidence already before the court regarding payment and notice for applicant's attendance was not timely or sufficient.

Court Disposition

application for adjournment refused

Orders

  • ['The application for an adjournment of the proceedings be refused.']