Evangelinidis, in the matter of Tsekouras v Tsekouras [2000] FCA 860
There was no legitimate forensic purpose for an adjournment as there was evidence already before the court regarding payment and notice for applicant's attendance was not timely or sufficient.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Application for Adjournment
- Outcome
- application for adjournment refused
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment of Proceedings']
['civil Procedure'] ['adjournment of Proceedings']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Petition / Application for Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be adjourned to allow the respondent to obtain legal assistance, issue subpoenas, and call the applicant to give evidence.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no legitimate forensic purpose for an adjournment as there was evidence already before the court regarding payment and notice for applicant's attendance was not timely or sufficient.
Court Disposition
application for adjournment refused
Orders
- ['The application for an adjournment of the proceedings be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment