Dye v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2010] NSWSC 1237
On the balance of the facts and arguments presented, and pursuant to s 5(1)(b)(ii)(C) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987, it is in the interests of justice to transfer the defamation proceedings to the Federal Court, with an order for the plaintiff to pay costs wasted by reason of the transfer.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Transfer of Proceedings
- Outcome
- order for transfer and costs
- Legal Topics
- ['transfer of Proceedings' 'defamation' 'cross Vesting' 'interests of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Transfer of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether defamation proceedings in the Supreme Court of NSW should be transferred to Federal Court' 'Whether the statutory criteria of s 5(1)(a)-(b) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) have been satisfied' 'Whether the interests of justice require the defamation proceedings be transferred']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of the facts and arguments presented, and pursuant to s 5(1)(b)(ii)(C) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987, it is in the interests of justice to transfer the defamation proceedings to the Federal Court, with an order for the plaintiff to pay costs wasted by reason of the transfer.
Court Disposition
order for transfer and costs
Orders
- ['Order the transfer of the defamation proceedings to the Federal Court.' 'Order the plaintiff to pay the costs of the defendants wasted by reason of the transfer.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment