R v J Lucas; R v B Lucas (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1809
Voice identification evidence from Federal Agent Cuthbertson is inadmissible because he is in no better position than the jury to assess the identity of the voice and does not qualify as an ad hoc expert under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW); in any event, the evidence is irrelevant and, if relevant and admissible, must be excluded owing to unfair prejudice under s 137 of the Evidence Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling
- Outcome
- voice identification evidence excluded
- Legal Topics
- ['voice Identification' 'admissibility of Expert Opinion' 'relevance' 'probative Vs Prejudicial Value']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is the voice identification evidence proffered by Federal Agent Cuthbertson admissible?' 'Does Federal Agent Cuthbertson qualify as an ad hoc expert under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)?' 'Is the opinion evidence relevant or unfairly prejudicial under s 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)?']
Ratio Decidendi
Voice identification evidence from Federal Agent Cuthbertson is inadmissible because he is in no better position than the jury to assess the identity of the voice and does not qualify as an ad hoc expert under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW); in any event, the evidence is irrelevant and, if relevant and admissible, must be excluded owing to unfair prejudice under s 137 of the Evidence Act.
Court Disposition
voice identification evidence excluded
Orders
- ['Voice identification evidence of Federal Agent Cuthbertson is not permitted to be led in the trial.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment