Vok Beverages Pty Ltd v Diageo Brands BV [2014] NSWCA 322
The proposed amendments by Vok were not, on the available material, so clearly untenable that they could not possibly succeed; therefore, refusal to allow amendment on both substantive and case management grounds miscarried, and leave to amend should be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted; Appeal Allowed
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; amendments permitted
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment Application' 'case Management' 'commercial Contract' 'discovery']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted; Appeal Allowed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether amendment was arguable and should be allowed' 'Whether amendment breached Distribution Agreement regarding overhead and freight charges' "Interpretation of contract terms 'Transfer Price' and freight charges"]
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendments by Vok were not, on the available material, so clearly untenable that they could not possibly succeed; therefore, refusal to allow amendment on both substantive and case management grounds miscarried, and leave to amend should be granted.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; amendments permitted
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Direct the applicant to file and serve a notice of appeal in the form of the draft notice of appeal at pages 37-41 of the White Book within 7 days, and dispense with the requirement for service of that notice of appeal.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Set aside the orders made by Ball J on 13 August...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment