Mentha, in the matter of The Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Limited (administrators appointed) [2011] FCA 104

Mentha, in the matter of The Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Limited (administrators appointed) [2011] FCA 104

The orders were made because the administrators were justified in entering the coal supply agreement, the agreement was in the creditors' interests, the proposed limitation of liability matched the agreed contractual position and caused no prejudice to the purchaser or creditors, the Committee of Creditors unanimously supported the application, the only secured creditor did not oppose it, and there was a sound basis for the confidentiality orders.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application Concerning Voluntary Administration Under the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Pt 5.3 a / Application for Directions Under S 447 D and Orders Under S 447 A(1); Reasons for Orders Made on 8 February 2011
Outcome
Orders made as sought in the application.
Legal Topics
['voluntary Administration' 'administrator Personal Liability' 'directions to Administrators' 'modification of Pt 5.3 A' 'coal Supply Agreement' 'confidentiality Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Application Concerning Voluntary Administration Under the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Pt 5.3 a / Application for Directions Under S 447 D and Orders Under S 447 A(1); Reasons for Orders Made on 8 February 2011

  1. 1 ['Whether the administrators were justified in causing Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd to enter into the coal supply agreement dated 21 December 2010 with Perdaman Chemicals and Fertilisers Pty Ltd.' "Whether orders should be made under s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) limiting the administrators' personal liability under the coal supply agreement to liabilities accruing during the voluntary administration." 'Whether confidentiality orders should be made for specified confidential exhibits.']

Ratio Decidendi

The orders were made because the administrators were justified in entering the coal supply agreement, the agreement was in the creditors' interests, the proposed limitation of liability matched the agreed contractual position and caused no prejudice to the purchaser or creditors, the Committee of Creditors unanimously supported the application, the only secured creditor did not oppose it, and there was a sound basis for the confidentiality orders.

Court Disposition

Orders made as sought in the application.

Orders

  • ['Directed pursuant to s 447D of the Corporations Act that the first plaintiffs were justified in causing the second plaintiff, The Griffin Coal Mining Company Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (ACN 008 667 385) (Griffin Coal), to enter into a coal supply agreement dated 21 December 2010 with Perdaman Chemicals and...