Mentha, in the matter of The Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Limited (administrators appointed) [2011] FCA 104
The orders were made because the administrators were justified in entering the coal supply agreement, the agreement was in the creditors' interests, the proposed limitation of liability matched the agreed contractual position and caused no prejudice to the purchaser or creditors, the Committee of Creditors unanimously supported the application, the only secured creditor did not oppose it, and there was a sound basis for the confidentiality orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application Concerning Voluntary Administration Under the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Pt 5.3 a / Application for Directions Under S 447 D and Orders Under S 447 A(1); Reasons for Orders Made on 8 February 2011
- Outcome
- Orders made as sought in the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['voluntary Administration' 'administrator Personal Liability' 'directions to Administrators' 'modification of Pt 5.3 A' 'coal Supply Agreement' 'confidentiality Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application Concerning Voluntary Administration Under the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Pt 5.3 a / Application for Directions Under S 447 D and Orders Under S 447 A(1); Reasons for Orders Made on 8 February 2011
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the administrators were justified in causing Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd to enter into the coal supply agreement dated 21 December 2010 with Perdaman Chemicals and Fertilisers Pty Ltd.' "Whether orders should be made under s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) limiting the administrators' personal liability under the coal supply agreement to liabilities accruing during the voluntary administration." 'Whether confidentiality orders should be made for specified confidential exhibits.']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders were made because the administrators were justified in entering the coal supply agreement, the agreement was in the creditors' interests, the proposed limitation of liability matched the agreed contractual position and caused no prejudice to the purchaser or creditors, the Committee of Creditors unanimously supported the application, the only secured creditor did not oppose it, and there was a sound basis for the confidentiality orders.
Court Disposition
Orders made as sought in the application.
Orders
- ['Directed pursuant to s 447D of the Corporations Act that the first plaintiffs were justified in causing the second plaintiff, The Griffin Coal Mining Company Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (ACN 008 667 385) (Griffin Coal), to enter into a coal supply agreement dated 21 December 2010 with Perdaman Chemicals and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment