Re South Burnett Wines Limited (Administrators Appointed) [2004] NSWSC 1239

Re South Burnett Wines Limited (Administrators Appointed) [2004] NSWSC 1239

The convening period was extended because the administrators could not yet make realistic and considered recommendations to creditors, given incomplete records and the need for a specialised real estate valuation, and because the extension could allow continued trading and maximisation of returns. The Court was significantly influenced by the support of creditors holding a majority in value, including all potential secured creditors and more than half of the unsecured creditors, notwithstanding Cospak's opposition and the pending winding up application.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 439 A(6) Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Extend the Convening Period of a Voluntary Administration / Hearing of Application, Ex Tempore Judgment
Outcome
Convening period extended.
Legal Topics
['voluntary Administration' 'extension of Convening Period' 'winding Up Application' 'creditor Opposition' 'valuation of Company Assets']
['corporations' 'insolvency'] ['voluntary Administration' 'extension of Convening Period' 'winding Up Application' 'creditor Opposition' 'valuation of Company Assets']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 439 A(6) Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Extend the Convening Period of a Voluntary Administration / Hearing of Application, Ex Tempore Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the convening period of the administration of South Burnett Wines Limited should be extended until 1 March 2005 under section 439A(6) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the existence of a pending winding up application and an opposing creditor should affect the grant of an extension.' 'Whether an extension was justified to allow the administrators to obtain a valuation of specialised real estate assets, prepare recommendations to creditors, and potentially maximise returns to creditors.']

Ratio Decidendi

The convening period was extended because the administrators could not yet make realistic and considered recommendations to creditors, given incomplete records and the need for a specialised real estate valuation, and because the extension could allow continued trading and maximisation of returns. The Court was significantly influenced by the support of creditors holding a majority in value, including all potential secured creditors and more than half of the unsecured creditors, notwithstanding Cospak's opposition and the pending winding up application.

Court Disposition

Convening period extended.

Orders

  • ['Order 1 in the originating process made.' 'Order 3 in the originating process made.' 'Costs of Cospak Pty Ltd appearing on the application reserved.' 'Orders may be entered forthwith.']