Strawbridge, in the matter of Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd (administrators appointed) (No 8) [2020] FCA 1344
Administrators, by entering into a binding sale agreement for the Virgin Companies’ assets, have lawfully limited the range of options available to creditors, and there is no requirement that administrators place a rival DOCA on the ballot or appoint a facilitator. The relief sought to compel administrators or direct procedural steps was dismissed as inconsistent with the statutory scheme and administrators’ powers.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Vaughan Strawbridge, Salvatore Algeri, John Greig and Richard Hughes, in their capacity as joint and several voluntary administrators of each of Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd (administrators appointed); Second Plaintiff: Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd (administrators appointed); Third Plaintiff: Virgin Australia International Operations Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (and others named in the Schedule); Applicants: Broad Peak Investment Advisers Pte Ltd (for and on behalf of Broad Peak Master Fund II Ltd and Broad Peak Asia Credit Opportunities Holdings Pte Ltd) and Tor Investment Management (Hong Kong) Ltd; Interested Person: BC Hart Aggregator, L.P. and BC Hart Aggregator (Australia) Pty Ltd (Bain Capital); Interested Person: Commonwealth of Australia; Bondholders' Representative Group / Interested Person: Alexander Funds Management Pty Ltd, Morgans Financial Limited, Crestone Wealth Management Limited, Mason Stevens Limited, Escala Partners Pty Ltd, Yarra Funds Management Limited, Realm Pty Ltd, Cameron Harrison Private Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Voluntary Administration; Interlocutory Application / Decision on Interlocutory Application Prior to Second Meeting of Creditors
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Administration, Deed of Company Arrangement (doca), Administrator Powers, Creditors’ Meetings, Facilitator Appointment, Information Provision to Creditors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vaughan Strawbridge, Salvatore Algeri, John Greig and Richard Hughes, in their capacity as joint and several voluntary administrators of each of Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd (administrators appointed)
First Plaintiff
Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd (administrators appointed)
Second Plaintiff
Virgin Australia International Operations Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (and others named in the Schedule)
Third Plaintiff
Broad Peak Investment Advisers Pte Ltd (for and on behalf of Broad Peak Master Fund II Ltd and Broad Peak Asia Credit Opportunities Holdings Pte Ltd) and Tor Investment Management (Hong Kong) Ltd
Applicants
BC Hart Aggregator, L.P. and BC Hart Aggregator (Australia) Pty Ltd (Bain Capital)
Interested Person
Commonwealth of Australia
Interested Person
Alexander Funds Management Pty Ltd, Morgans Financial Limited, Crestone Wealth Management Limited, Mason Stevens Limited, Escala Partners Pty Ltd, Yarra Funds Management Limited, Realm Pty Ltd, Cameron Harrison Private Pty Ltd
Bondholders' Representative Group / Interested Person
Procedural Posture
Voluntary Administration; Interlocutory Application / Decision on Interlocutory Application Prior to Second Meeting of Creditors
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrators must place an alternative deed of company arrangement (DOCA) on the ballot at the second meeting of creditors
- 2 Whether administrators’ contractual obligations under sale agreement preclude consideration of rival DOCA proposals
- 3 Whether a facilitator should be appointed to assist creditors prior to the second meeting
Ratio Decidendi
Administrators, by entering into a binding sale agreement for the Virgin Companies’ assets, have lawfully limited the range of options available to creditors, and there is no requirement that administrators place a rival DOCA on the ballot or appoint a facilitator. The relief sought to compel administrators or direct procedural steps was dismissed as inconsistent with the statutory scheme and administrators’ powers.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Interlocutory Process filed by Broad Peak and Tor dismissed
- Applicants (Broad Peak and Tor) to pay Plaintiffs’ costs of interlocutory process
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment