VP v R [2021] NSWCCA 11

VP v R [2021] NSWCCA 11

Majority (McCallum JA, N Adams J): The failure to call other family members as witnesses did not result in a miscarriage of justice since the defence was given notice and made a tactical decision not to press for their evidence, and the judge properly directed herself according to established legal principles. The verdicts were open on the evidence, and no error or miscarriage of justice was demonstrated. Minority (Campbell J): The applicant was denied a fair trial by the Crown's failure to call available and potentially cogent household witnesses, which should have resulted in a retrial or acquittal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed (majority).
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Conviction' 'child Sexual Assault' 'failure to Call Material Witnesses' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'mahmood Direction' 'judicial Reasoning in Judge Alone Trials']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 ['Whether failure by the Crown to call material witnesses resulted in a miscarriage of justice' 'Whether the guilty verdicts were unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence' 'Whether the trial judge failed to give proper reasons or consideration regarding the Mahmood direction']

Ratio Decidendi

Majority (McCallum JA, N Adams J): The failure to call other family members as witnesses did not result in a miscarriage of justice since the defence was given notice and made a tactical decision not to press for their evidence, and the judge properly directed herself according to established legal principles. The verdicts were open on the evidence, and no error or miscarriage of justice was demonstrated. Minority (Campbell J): The applicant was denied a fair trial by the Crown's failure to call available and potentially cogent household witnesses, which should have resulted in a retrial or acquittal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed (majority).

Orders

  • ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Dismiss the appeal.']