Langley v Foster [1906] HCA 28

Langley v Foster [1906] HCA 28

The agreement, while arguably invalid or ineffective as against the Crown with respect to the conditional lease, is not necessarily illegal, and should be construed, if possible, so as to permit lawful performance. The agreement may be enforced as to the land covered by conditional purchases and, as to the conditional lease, as a covenant to assist the applicant in acquiring necessary Crown permissions, provided there is no evidence of intent to break the law. The statutory restrictions do not constitute conditions the breach of which would cause forfeiture, and the lawful portions of the agreement can be specifically enforced.

Parties
Appellant: W. Langley; Respondent: A. W. J. Foster
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 May 1906
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Outcome
Appeal allowed; agreement to be specifically performed.
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Illegality of Contract, Crown Lands, Leases, Timber Licences, Construction of Statutory Conditions
Contract Law Property Law Specific Performance Illegality of Contract Crown Lands Leases Timber Licences Construction of Statutory Conditions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W. Langley

Appellant

A. W. J. Foster

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an agreement to grant a lease and incidental rights (timber cutting/tramways) over conditional purchases and a conditional lease under the Crown Lands Act (N.S.W.) is illegal or capable of specific performance, given statutory restrictions.
  2. 2 Whether the agreement necessarily involves illegality or risk of forfeiture under the Crown Lands Act 1884, secs. 96, 98.

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement, while arguably invalid or ineffective as against the Crown with respect to the conditional lease, is not necessarily illegal, and should be construed, if possible, so as to permit lawful performance. The agreement may be enforced as to the land covered by conditional purchases and, as to the conditional lease, as a covenant to assist the applicant in acquiring necessary Crown permissions, provided there is no evidence of intent to break the law. The statutory restrictions do not constitute conditions the breach of which would cause forfeiture, and the lawful portions of the agreement can be specifically enforced.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; agreement to be specifically performed.

Orders

  • Declaration that the agreement ought to be specifically performed.
  • Defendant to execute a lease accordingly, lease to be settled by the Master in case of disagreement.