W216 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1356
The application was dismissed because nothing was shown to indicate that any ground of review under s 476 applied; the Tribunal had good and sufficient grounds for its adverse credibility findings and was not satisfied that the applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution in Syria.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'credibility Findings' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'judicial Review Under S 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether any ground for review under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was shown in relation to the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision." "Whether the Tribunal had a sufficient basis to reject the applicant's claims as lacking credibility and affirm the refusal of protection visas."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because nothing was shown to indicate that any ground of review under s 476 applied; the Tribunal had good and sufficient grounds for its adverse credibility findings and was not satisfied that the applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution in Syria.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment