W401 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1738
The Tribunal failed to properly assess whether there was a real chance the applicant would face persecution upon return to Afghanistan as a failed asylum seeker (sur place claim), constituting a reviewable error of law.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: W401; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Interlocutory; Adjournment for Further Submissions Before Final Determination
- Outcome
- Adjourned for further submissions; no final order on merits at this stage
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Protection, Judicial Review, Error of Law, Real Chance of Persecution, Failed Asylum Seekers, Discretionary Relief
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W401
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Interlocutory; Adjournment for Further Submissions Before Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in law by failing to properly consider whether the applicant faced a real chance of persecution as a failed asylum seeker from Afghanistan (sur place claim)
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion not to set aside the Tribunal's decision due to changed circumstances in Afghanistan
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal failed to properly assess whether there was a real chance the applicant would face persecution upon return to Afghanistan as a failed asylum seeker (sur place claim), constituting a reviewable error of law.
Court Disposition
Adjourned for further submissions; no final order on merits at this stage
Orders
- The hearing of the application is further adjourned to 14 January 2002 at 2.15pm to enable the parties to prepare submissions to the Court on whether or not the Court should exercise its discretion to decline to make any order setting aside the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision.
- Liberty to apply.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment