WACW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 155

WACW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 155

The appeal failed because the Tribunal had considered but disbelieved the appellant's later claims, credibility assessment was for the Tribunal, the United Nations Handbook had no force in Australian law so non-observance could not constitute error of law, there was evidence or other material to justify the Tribunal's decision, and no error of law, jurisdictional error, or bias was shown.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal Dismissed
Outcome
The appeal was dismissed and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'convention Related Persecution' 'judicial Review' 'no Evidence Ground' 'error of Law' 'united Nations Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status' 'credibility Findings']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'convention Related Persecution' 'judicial Review' 'no Evidence Ground' 'error of Law' 'united Nations Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status' 'credibility Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision involved an error of law under s 476(1)(e) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." "Whether there was no evidence or other material to justify the Tribunal's decision under s 476(1)(g) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), read with s 476(4)(b)." 'Whether failure to follow procedures in the United Nations Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status gave rise to an error of law.' "Whether the Tribunal disregarded the appellant's later claims or permissibly disbelieved them." 'Whether adverse credibility findings supported an inference of actual or perceived bias.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because the Tribunal had considered but disbelieved the appellant's later claims, credibility assessment was for the Tribunal, the United Nations Handbook had no force in Australian law so non-observance could not constitute error of law, there was evidence or other material to justify the Tribunal's decision, and no error of law, jurisdictional error, or bias was shown.

Court Disposition

The appeal was dismissed and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the respondent.']