Mohamed v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1004
For the purposes of Div 1.5 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), only a statutory declaration made in accordance with the Statutory Declarations Act 1959 (Cth) is valid evidence; statutory declarations made under State legislation do not satisfy this requirement, and thus the Tribunal was correct in rejecting the appellant’s evidence of domestic violence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Declarations' 'regulatory Interpretation' 'domestic Violence Proof Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether ‘statutory declaration’ in Div 1.5 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) includes declarations made under State legislation or only those under the Statutory Declarations Act 1959 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
For the purposes of Div 1.5 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), only a statutory declaration made in accordance with the Statutory Declarations Act 1959 (Cth) is valid evidence; statutory declarations made under State legislation do not satisfy this requirement, and thus the Tribunal was correct in rejecting the appellant’s evidence of domestic violence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment