Hossain, Wakil v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 738
The applicant was afforded the opportunity to appear before the Refugee Review Tribunal and present evidence but failed to do so. No request for an adjournment to obtain further documents was made. The Tribunal did not breach s 425 or fail to provide procedural fairness, and was entitled to decide the case on the material before it.
- Parties
- Applicant: Wakil Hossain; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Decision on Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visa, Refugee Review Tribunal, Procedural Fairness, Section 425 Migration Act, Refugee Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wakil Hossain
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to comply with Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 425
- 2 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to provide fair procedures
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was afforded the opportunity to appear before the Refugee Review Tribunal and present evidence but failed to do so. No request for an adjournment to obtain further documents was made. The Tribunal did not breach s 425 or fail to provide procedural fairness, and was entitled to decide the case on the material before it.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed
Orders
- The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal dated 19 February 1998 be affirmed.
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment