Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2007] NSWLEC 304
Proceeding with the hearing on the remitted issues prior to the High Court's decision would not have sufficient utility to justify the costs and risks of unnecessary litigation; therefore, the scheduled June hearing dates should be vacated and the matter adjourned until after the High Court delivers its decision.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Post Remitter, Pending High Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Hearing adjourned; scheduled dates vacated.
- Legal Topics
- ['market Value Determination' 'remitter Procedure' 'adjournment Pending Appeal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Post Remitter, Pending High Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether further hearing should proceed on reserved matters pending High Court appeal' 'Utility of determining value on alternative bases prior to High Court decision' 'Apprehension of bias']
Ratio Decidendi
Proceeding with the hearing on the remitted issues prior to the High Court's decision would not have sufficient utility to justify the costs and risks of unnecessary litigation; therefore, the scheduled June hearing dates should be vacated and the matter adjourned until after the High Court delivers its decision.
Court Disposition
Hearing adjourned; scheduled dates vacated.
Orders
- ['Dates 25 to 29 June 2007 vacated.' 'Any further hearing adjourned until 14 days after the High Court makes a final decision.' 'Either party has liberty to apply on seven days notice.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment