WALKER V. WALKER

WALKER V. WALKER

The appropriate damages for failure to leave livestock should be based on the actual sale prices realised, not merely the lowest price at a given time. For plant and machinery, damages should be assessed based on a reliable estimate depreciated appropriately, but not excessively. No additional damages are warranted for loss of one year's rent because evidence does not show further loss beyond that already compensated.

Parties
Appellant: Walker; Respondent: Walker
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 October 1955
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Breach of Lease Agreement, Damages Assessment
Contract Law Breach of Lease Agreement Damages Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 19
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Walker

Appellant

Walker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Assessment of damages for breach of lease agreement
  2. 2 Proper measure of loss regarding failure to leave livestock and machinery per lease terms
  3. 3 Entitlement to damages for loss of potential rental income

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate damages for failure to leave livestock should be based on the actual sale prices realised, not merely the lowest price at a given time. For plant and machinery, damages should be assessed based on a reliable estimate depreciated appropriately, but not excessively. No additional damages are warranted for loss of one year's rent because evidence does not show further loss beyond that already compensated.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Order of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 20 April 1955 varied by substituting £5865 for £6561
  • Respondent to pay appellant's costs of the appeal